Before I start my long and in-depth review of this movie, I must warn everyone that this CONTAINS SOME SERIOUS FUCKING SPOILERS SO GET THE FUCK OUT NOW WHILE YOU CAN.
Because seriously, you can't even imagine the spoilers I'm about to impart on you.
Things That I Didn't Like:
FUCKING A
And by A, I mean aliens.
What.
What was that.
I mean, alright-- supernatural force imparts some wisdom on some Mayans. Cool. We can handle that. There's weird alien looking skull with mystical powers. Sure. They need to return it to a temple. Got it.
Was it really necessary to have a living alien right there on the screen? With a saucer? Seriously?
It would have been fine if aliens had kind of happened, because it tied into the Area 51 bunker lock-down stuff they were doing in the beginning, but... they should have been long dead and just... opened up a thing to the city of gold or a huge ancient library or some kind of actual ancient shit instead of some inter-dimensional space beings. That was too much.
Привет
They did well adjusting to the appropriate time period, but... Russians ain't no Nazis. Spulko was interesting, but I wanted another Dr. Schneider. The Nazis were smart enough to use someone who appealed to Indy's character, not some hard ass that everyone knows he's not going to actually go along with. I missed mein fuhrer and his cronies.
Indy Girls
There wasn't an Indy girl. Yes, there was the return of Marion, but she wasn't an Indy girl any more. She wasn't trying to resist his sarcastic charm and inevitably falling in love with him. She wasn't even really much help. And they got married, which seemed to me to be very out of character. There wasn't even an good age joke to go along with that.
The Natives
There were all these violent tribal people who didn't do anything. They looked creepy, came out of walls, tried to attack, then backed off. That's it. They could have done so much more with those people, either trying to protect the skull or whatever, but they were just tossed off to the side.
...And nothing happened
No booby traps. WHAT. There were several times in the movie when Indy told Mutt (LeBouf) not to touch anything while they were in some tomb or cave, and Mutt didn't touch anything, AND NOTHING HAPPENED. What. No.
That didn't sound right.
There was something not quite right about the score of this one. I checked several places and they do say that John Williams wrote the score, but it didn't sound like him. Well, I mean, the Indy theme sounded like him but there wasn't enough decrescendos and crescendos and sweeping fanfares, and the few attempts at sweeping fanfares were poorly placed within the film. It sounded like someone else trying to write his music for him and I don't know why.
You know how you can pick out your favourite band's music, even if you haven't heard the words yet? I do that with film composers. I can recognize John Williams from Hans Zimmer from Harry Gregson-Williams and I honestly couldn't tell that this was John Williams' music. And that's disappointing.
Sit and stay there.
They were all over the place in this one. There's usually about three main locations for an Indy film, but this one was jumping all over South America. There were two travel montages. That's too many. You set it up with a line, do a short scene on transport, and either get there or get sidetracked. There's a specific formula for Indy movies and they didn't follow it.
South America
I think part of the reason I have some issues with this movie is because this took place in South America, whereas the other three have all ended up in Asia (or Northern Africa, but the Middle East is in Asia and that's close enough). It didn't feel right to be in jungle for most of the movie. I missed the desert and familiar ruins.
Not enough backing.
The crystal skulls was a poor choice, I think, for a central artifact. If they had gone about it like they did in Temple of Doom, I think it would have gone better, but they tried to play it out like Raiders and Last Crusade and we, as Westerners, are drawn to those kinds of things because Christianity is so ingrained in our culture. Temple of Doom draws us in because it plays on our interest in both the occult and "heathen" Asian cultures, but I think the crystal skulls and their role in ancient South American cultures is too big of a jump.
I mean, you say crystal skulls and there's not much connotation that comes to mind. You say Ark of the Covenant or the Holy Grail and there's immediate connotation. You say Temple of Doom and there's immediate intrigue.
They needed to set it up better. We needed more information from the ruins and the legends and less from the government conspiracies, I think.
Stereotype
This Indiana wasn't really Indy. He was like all of the stereotypes and iconography of Indiana with some age thrown it. All the subtle things that made him a great character were gone, and all the things people remember (the whip, the hat, the stunts) were overplayed. I mean, he was still a good character, but he wasn't really Indy.
Henry
I just watched The Last Crusade the other day, but I was still puzzled when people kept calling him Henry. Especially when all there "old friends" called him Henry because those friends should know better. He's been calling himself Indiana for years and years and no one even knew his name was Henry. It was dumb.
George, put your toys away.
George Lucas... we know you have the best FX company. And we know you like to push them into making new and better computer generated stuff. But we really didn't need it for this movie. Sweeping views of Mayan ruins and overly FXed shots aren't what we want. We want some punching and some history and some good one-liners. We're simple people.
Things That I Did Like:
Hey, old man.
I liked the old jokes. I missed them when they stopped coming. They were delivered brilliantly by Harrison Ford and those delivered by other characters resulted in some great responses. There weren't enough.
Stunts
I have to admit, the stunts were great. They were fun and ridiculous and everything a good Indy stunt should be.
Bike Chase
Probably the best thing about this movie was the chase through some city that wasn't supposed to be New Haven but I couldn't help just seeing Yale everywhere. XD
It was amazingly directed and the actors really seemed into it and it just felt right.
In addition to the actual chase, the scene in the library in the middle of it was great. Answering a student's question while clambering onto the back of a Harley? Yes please.
Set Work
The set work was amazing. In the close cropped, interior scenes in the tombs and ruins, you really felt like you were back in an Indy movie. They kept it tight in on the characters then because the sets weren't very large, but I like the feel of those shots.
Hey, hey, we're the Monkeys
It was a really stupid gag, but a bunch of monkeys following Mutt because they have the same hair and then attacking a Soviet jeep? Fucking hilarious. Really stupid and not especially great for an Indy movie, but hilarious.
Keep Your Indy Fresh!
Bomb. Plus refrudgerator. Plus Indiana Jones. Equals win. XDDD
Tribute
A corner of the ark, Brody and Jones, Sr.'s pictures on the desk... I liked all these tributes to the original trilogy. They made you remember little things that you loved about the first ones and, really, just having Sean Connery's face on the screen made the movie that much better.
I really don't have that many specific things that I liked about this movie. Mostly, I thought that the initial ideas were good but they were taken too far and exaggerated to the point of extreme. But it was an Indy movie and parts of it really felt like an Indy movie, so I can't say I dislike it.
I liked the first half. I really liked the first half. The second half makes me wonder what the fuck they were smoking that day, but I really really liked the first half.
I don't know. I think you'll have to see this one for yourself.
Friday, May 23, 2008
Sunday, May 18, 2008
The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian
Here we go kids. A movie review of Prince Caspian.
WARNING.
HERE THERE BE SPOILERS.
Things That I Didn't Like:
Caspian/Susan OTP OTWHAT?!
This is, without a doubt, the biggest thing I have an issue with in this movie. What the hell was that Caspian/Susan lovefest? Flirting glances and poor pick-up lines... what the crap? These movies don't need love interests, movie folks. They are children. I know Susan's all growing up and whatnot, but she doesn't get boy crazy until after she leaves Narnia for good. And there was no way that relationship could have gone anywhere, so what was the point?
Tension and glances, I would have been fine with, but actual kissing was too much. And stupid. It just doesn't make any sense. As far as I could see, there wasn't even any tension between them in the book at all. CS Lewis gave no indication that there was anything more than friendship there and it's frustrating that the movie makers decided to write in some fangirl bullshit.
That... doesn't look right.
In the first movie, the creature animation and make-up was phenomenal; no one can deny that. But I felt that, in this movie, the animation and make up was subpar. Some of the movement between torsos and lower bodies for the centaurs and fauns didn't quite match up and the minotaurs seemed so much smaller and lighter than their first movie counterparts.
I'm especially disappointed with the minotaurs. In the first movie, everything from the waist up was animatronic suit pieces and they looked amazing. They had the weight and the movement that a large animal would actually have, but this movie went with a lot more CGI work on the minotaurs and they don't look heavy or built like bulls. They just look furry. And some of the animation of the running seems to have them almost not touch the ground, when they should be shaking the ground somewhat with their large mass.
The fauns were better than the minotaurs, for the most part, but a few of them didn't have clearly defined goat legs (just furry legs), and a couple of the jumping ones weren't using the right leg muscles and bends in order to get the jumps that they did. :/
Normally, these things wouldn't bother me as much as they do for this movie, but it's so disappointing after the amazing job they did with the minotaurs and fauns in the last movie.
The Lion's Smile
This kind of ties into the last thing with my issues with animation, but I didn't like how much more human they made Aslan's mouth movement. Particularly, his smile. It was just a little bit too exaggerated for my taste; Aslan's not meant to be made more human or soft. He's not a tame lion, after all.
Step forward, Edmund
The director/writers for the movie obviously wanted to play up Peter's role because he's not coming back to Narnia, but they did so at the expense of Edmund. With two lead males in Peter and Caspian, poor Edmund got pushed back into the midground when he really should have been more of a prominent player. Yes, he got more lines and good moments in this one because he wasn't off with the White Witch, but I don't think anyone could say that Edmund was Peter's equal when he was supposed to be. Edmund and Peter were equals as Kings, but Edmund was displaying a more subservient role than he should have.
I know I'm biased because I do love Edmund. He's probably the most developed character (aside from, possibly, Eustace) in the Chronicles, and he's most definitely the most grown out of the four children and I really hate to see characters like that get the short end of the stick.
However, this does make me look forward to Voyage of the Dawn Treader more because there won't be multiple strong male leads to get in the way. It'll be interesting to see what they do with him then.
Things That I Am Not Sure About:
There's only one thing here and it's Georgie Henley. I loved her as Lucy in LWW, but I'm not sure about her in this one. She's growing up into a lovely young woman, yes, but it doesn't appear that she's improved in her acting any. I don't know if that's because of the direction given to her or her actual talent, but there was something off or exaggerated about many of her important solo moments. She works wonderfully with the other kids, but I'm not sure she can hold her own for Lucy's solo moments.
Things That I Did Like:
Still Alive?
You all might be surprised to hear this, but I actually did like the scene with the White Witch almost returning. This issue was touched upon in the book, Nikabrik and his two dark goons there did want Caspian to bring her back, but they did not go nearly as far as they did in the movie. But I think the scene in the movie showed some things about the Witch that people wouldn't necessarily get from the first movie that readers would have gotten from a couple of the books.
The first thing that I very much appreciated is that it was made clear that Jadis is a temptress. It's always been understood that she's evil, but the reason why she can get people under her power is that she is very beautiful and very persuasive and knows how to use that. Watching the movie, you know that Caspian and Peter really didn't want to bring her back, but she knows how to use her beauty and charm to sway even her most bitter enemies.
Also, it provided a physical link to the idea that she is not of Narnia. Everyone assumes that she dies at the end of LWW, but many readers and viewers don't know that she's from a much older, much more barren world with and, if she needed to, she could escape from Narnia. She doesn't want to, obviously, but she could.
Also, I liked that Edmund finally got to pwn her hardcore. He kicked some major ass in that scene.
Costumes
They did a fantastic job with the costumes in this one. I really liked the design of the Telemarine armor and how their leather armor contrasted to the Narnian plate armor. I reeeaallly liked the design of Susan's archer armor. And because I'm a faggot, I kept looking at all the different stitching and designs of people's shirts. A lot of times in movies like these, they kind of pick one base design and everything is derived from that one shirt, but... they got creative on this one. XD
Reepicheep
Oh thank GOD he wasn't another Jar Jar Binks. His character is written very energetically and vocal and he had the potential to be extremely annoying and terrible. But they did a good job with the line choice and Eddie Izzard was great with the tone and inflection. Reepicheep was really portrayed well.
Soundtrack
Harry Gregson-Williams has done it again with another brilliant score and excellent song choices. He's wonderful. That's all I've got to say about that.
SO YES.
Prince Caspian is a must for any Narnia and fantasy adventure fan. I really really enjoyed it.
And have seen it twice already. XD
WARNING.
HERE THERE BE SPOILERS.
Things That I Didn't Like:
Caspian/Susan OTP OTWHAT?!
This is, without a doubt, the biggest thing I have an issue with in this movie. What the hell was that Caspian/Susan lovefest? Flirting glances and poor pick-up lines... what the crap? These movies don't need love interests, movie folks. They are children. I know Susan's all growing up and whatnot, but she doesn't get boy crazy until after she leaves Narnia for good. And there was no way that relationship could have gone anywhere, so what was the point?
Tension and glances, I would have been fine with, but actual kissing was too much. And stupid. It just doesn't make any sense. As far as I could see, there wasn't even any tension between them in the book at all. CS Lewis gave no indication that there was anything more than friendship there and it's frustrating that the movie makers decided to write in some fangirl bullshit.
That... doesn't look right.
In the first movie, the creature animation and make-up was phenomenal; no one can deny that. But I felt that, in this movie, the animation and make up was subpar. Some of the movement between torsos and lower bodies for the centaurs and fauns didn't quite match up and the minotaurs seemed so much smaller and lighter than their first movie counterparts.
I'm especially disappointed with the minotaurs. In the first movie, everything from the waist up was animatronic suit pieces and they looked amazing. They had the weight and the movement that a large animal would actually have, but this movie went with a lot more CGI work on the minotaurs and they don't look heavy or built like bulls. They just look furry. And some of the animation of the running seems to have them almost not touch the ground, when they should be shaking the ground somewhat with their large mass.
The fauns were better than the minotaurs, for the most part, but a few of them didn't have clearly defined goat legs (just furry legs), and a couple of the jumping ones weren't using the right leg muscles and bends in order to get the jumps that they did. :/
Normally, these things wouldn't bother me as much as they do for this movie, but it's so disappointing after the amazing job they did with the minotaurs and fauns in the last movie.
The Lion's Smile
This kind of ties into the last thing with my issues with animation, but I didn't like how much more human they made Aslan's mouth movement. Particularly, his smile. It was just a little bit too exaggerated for my taste; Aslan's not meant to be made more human or soft. He's not a tame lion, after all.
Step forward, Edmund
The director/writers for the movie obviously wanted to play up Peter's role because he's not coming back to Narnia, but they did so at the expense of Edmund. With two lead males in Peter and Caspian, poor Edmund got pushed back into the midground when he really should have been more of a prominent player. Yes, he got more lines and good moments in this one because he wasn't off with the White Witch, but I don't think anyone could say that Edmund was Peter's equal when he was supposed to be. Edmund and Peter were equals as Kings, but Edmund was displaying a more subservient role than he should have.
I know I'm biased because I do love Edmund. He's probably the most developed character (aside from, possibly, Eustace) in the Chronicles, and he's most definitely the most grown out of the four children and I really hate to see characters like that get the short end of the stick.
However, this does make me look forward to Voyage of the Dawn Treader more because there won't be multiple strong male leads to get in the way. It'll be interesting to see what they do with him then.
Things That I Am Not Sure About:
There's only one thing here and it's Georgie Henley. I loved her as Lucy in LWW, but I'm not sure about her in this one. She's growing up into a lovely young woman, yes, but it doesn't appear that she's improved in her acting any. I don't know if that's because of the direction given to her or her actual talent, but there was something off or exaggerated about many of her important solo moments. She works wonderfully with the other kids, but I'm not sure she can hold her own for Lucy's solo moments.
Things That I Did Like:
Still Alive?
You all might be surprised to hear this, but I actually did like the scene with the White Witch almost returning. This issue was touched upon in the book, Nikabrik and his two dark goons there did want Caspian to bring her back, but they did not go nearly as far as they did in the movie. But I think the scene in the movie showed some things about the Witch that people wouldn't necessarily get from the first movie that readers would have gotten from a couple of the books.
The first thing that I very much appreciated is that it was made clear that Jadis is a temptress. It's always been understood that she's evil, but the reason why she can get people under her power is that she is very beautiful and very persuasive and knows how to use that. Watching the movie, you know that Caspian and Peter really didn't want to bring her back, but she knows how to use her beauty and charm to sway even her most bitter enemies.
Also, it provided a physical link to the idea that she is not of Narnia. Everyone assumes that she dies at the end of LWW, but many readers and viewers don't know that she's from a much older, much more barren world with and, if she needed to, she could escape from Narnia. She doesn't want to, obviously, but she could.
Also, I liked that Edmund finally got to pwn her hardcore. He kicked some major ass in that scene.
Costumes
They did a fantastic job with the costumes in this one. I really liked the design of the Telemarine armor and how their leather armor contrasted to the Narnian plate armor. I reeeaallly liked the design of Susan's archer armor. And because I'm a faggot, I kept looking at all the different stitching and designs of people's shirts. A lot of times in movies like these, they kind of pick one base design and everything is derived from that one shirt, but... they got creative on this one. XD
Reepicheep
Oh thank GOD he wasn't another Jar Jar Binks. His character is written very energetically and vocal and he had the potential to be extremely annoying and terrible. But they did a good job with the line choice and Eddie Izzard was great with the tone and inflection. Reepicheep was really portrayed well.
Soundtrack
Harry Gregson-Williams has done it again with another brilliant score and excellent song choices. He's wonderful. That's all I've got to say about that.
SO YES.
Prince Caspian is a must for any Narnia and fantasy adventure fan. I really really enjoyed it.
And have seen it twice already. XD
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)